Archives for May 2012

Remembering Adam “MCA” Yauch’s Dubstep Influence: Beastie Boys Let the Beat–mmmm–Drop

Beastie Boys + Billy Idol = Nice mashup

Dubstep writer Sarah Bennett contributed to this post.

It’s another week in the dubstep universe and another death of an iconic musician. News of the death of Beastie Boys member MCA (a.k.a. Adam Yauch) has us dusting off the New York trio’s groundbreaking hip hop albums and breaking out the best of the Beasties — and there’s a lot of it. Losing someone as influential as MCA forces us to hit “rewind” on our musical lives (though we do more scrolling through songs these days than the physical tape-player maneuver we would have done in the Beasties’ era) and look back on what got us here.

Beastie Boys are a good example of a group that dove head-first into experimenting with sounds and breaking down genres, both foundational concepts of L.A. dubstep. They started out as a hardcore punk band–in the vein of Black Flag–morphing into rappers after meeting some success in NYC with a hip-hop release. The guitar-bass-drums trio were now using their ear to make funk-hop hybrids — tasty beds of beats to rap over. MCA traded in his electric bass for lower-pitched, ashy-delivered lyrics, setting himself apart as a distinct voice in the group’s fast-paced flow.

The band’s second studio album, 1988′ Paul’s Boutique, is one that has a particularly unique relationship to dubstep in that the majority of its music is comprised of samples, layered on top of one another using manual techniques that were newly being explored. Dubstep lovers have to give a nod to their work which was made of organic found melodies and beats before beat-production software even existed–and that’s in addition to pushing lyrical raunch on its slack-jawed audience with a playful but hard attitude and being relentlessly honest about the fact that they came to party.

There are so many samples used in Paul’s Boutique, in fact, that there is an entire website dedicated to exploring its individual pieces, references and lyrical inspirations, an interest in context and history that is lost on much of new electronic music. Dubstep fans prowling Soundcloud or Tumblr for new mixtapes today can only guess as to the origins of the sounds the DJ used to make his favorite track–and that’s assuming if the DJ even knows where he got the beats himself.

The death of MCA reminds us how hard it is to trace back music’s DNA strands in today’s reblogged, creative-commons world, but the late icon’s work with found sounds and the Beastie Boys shows the importance of knowing your roots, a rallying cry that we strive to learn from every day.

 

RIP MCA. YOU WILL BE MISSED!!

 

Is Fun.’s Song “It Gets Better” an Anti-Dubstep Anthem?

Sure, Nate Ruess has come a long way since his folk-loving power pop days as Phoenix’s The Format, but does the Fun. frontman hate Dubstep now? The band best known for its current Janelle-Monae-featuring single “We Are Young” is unabashedly pop friendly, harking back to 70s rock bands with some modern theatrical production magic worked in. Personally, we prefer Ruess’ songwriting dressed down as with the Format’s 2003 Interventions and Lullabies, but Fun. is definitely, well, fun.

So imagine our sadness when we get deep into the band’s debut album Some Nights and–after many sleepless nights of dubstep on the brain–we realize that one song is not like the others (AKA, lacking in serious Freddy Mercury hero worship). And after getting it in our heads that Ruess’ latest band and album is trying to save theatrical rock, it’s hard to listen to the track “It Gets Better” and not see it as a blatant attack on the genre of dubstep.

The song abruptly starts with the “robots having sex” sound that many find offensive about dubstep and features about 20 seconds of this high-register wobbly 2-step electronic snare beat, complete with glitchy tweaks under a Skrillex-esque autotune voice that sings, “What have we done? Oh my god.”

But the whole song is not this offense-t0-true-dubstep. Instead the verses and chorus have an insistent rock beat and pop-chord progression that continues over lyrics such as “You never looked so bored” and “It’s hard to stay inside my head when words keep pouring out” (which could be a reference to how dubstep DJs often create their music in a solitary environment).  The chorus itself repeats the line, “It gets better,” perhaps directly nodding to the return of the glitchy dubstep beat that re-occurs briefly in the build-up line before each chorus. The back-and-forth between catchy rock beats and the more off-putting 2-step beats makes for a schizophonic song that seems to spread an anti-dubstep case across three and a half minutes.

Do you think the song itself a battleground for these two supposedly disparate music genres or are we just getting our panties in a bunch?